Purporsed Speech as Purposed

This is an explanatory video of the framing of a summary judgement filing mailed on October 23, 2023. The initial upload (10/24/23), needed this visual reorientation of that extemporaneous production. The recording was done just before my partner and I were headed out on a walk on the back road together (a treat I have not had the time for due to the constraints placed on it due to the need to defend my #PurposedSpeech). While she was hanging a load of washing, I made this explanation of the KCSC filing's intent ... I, too, was curious what a description of the intended framework of that filing might look and sound like as a visualized metaphor.

This cogent version oriented it correctly and includes introduction and closing clips (10/25/23). The added graphic and collage encompass what is denied humans when unconstitutionally claimed by corporations whose purpose is Avarice ...& my first intentional exercise of that speech using the moniker #PurposedSpeech. Covenanted and combined Human speech is the speech that alone has sacred preeminent Constitutionally protected standing.

The opening graphic is an image I extracted from the video as artwork for a commemorative* magnet (imperfectly clean spoon holder dish used, as is). Nothing we humans do is more than a step on The Road of perfecting our Union ... or not.

The initial upload's description is repeated here:

The concept of Purposed Speech, as an implicit category of protected speech, is applicable only to human citizens of the United States. As a concept, Purposed Speech aligns with the core principles enshrined in the founding documents of the United States, inclusive of the Mayflower Compact, the Declaration of Independence, and the Preamble to the U.S. Constitution. Purposed Speech is speech that directly fulfills the purpose of self-governance, individual rights of Constitutional persons, and the democratic system:

It aligns with founding principles: Purposed Speech is rooted in the principles of self-governance, individual rights, and the consent of the governed as emphasized in the founding documents of the United States.
It's an inherent right of citizens: This category of speech is an inherent right of human citizens and encompasses activities related to political engagement, policy discussions, expressing political opinions, peaceful protests, and active participation in government decision-making.
Protects the democratic process: The protection of Purposed Speech is vital for the democratic process by enabling citizens to actively participate in shaping government policies, holding representatives accountable, and express and engage with their views in political matters as a civil body politic (a civic body politic).
It distinguishes from corporate entities: Purposed Speech differentiates between the speech rights of individual human citizens and those of state-chartered for-profit corporate entities, focusing primarily on the political and civic engagement of human citizens.

In essence, Purposed Speech represents the idea that certain forms of speech are protected because they are integral to the fundamental purpose of a democratic society, allowing Constitutional persons as citizens to actively engage in self-governance and the democratic process. While #PurposedSpeech may not yet be a legally recognized term, it reflects the principles upon which these United States of America was founded.

[pending ...] There are three other segments that relate to this core visualization: One is introductory. That one appreciatively credits a brilliant assessor's clean and clear framing of the snookering denying #PurposedSpeech. Subsequent segments are my reciting of the "here we go, change the cage". That channeled poem turned out to be the poetic precursor to hearing the paradoxically assumed ... to the point of being unnamed ... #PurposedSpeech a week later. Initial versions of those are done and are uploaded and linked here & here. The subsequents sections to those will be two QR code screens.

The first QR code will link to the the Maine legislative server as testimony related to the 131st LD 1775. There will be posted. Under the last name "Robie", the digital version of what was mailed on Monday (10/23/23) will be secured. LD 1775 is chosen as a stand-in for the 'clean'NOT! hydrogen snookering that insidiously masquerades as greenwashing and is a fact-in-law with the passage in 2022 of the IRA.It is where I posted, what was at the time, my latest update concerning the snookering of #BeltwayOfBills.The legislative server is intended to be a custodian of the digital version-as-record for the 10/23/23 filing.

The second QR code, also included in the digital filing, is currently intended to be a link to a ConceptMinds' visual mapping of all things #PurposedSpeech. FWIW, this whole Puritan-forebear-like Voyage for a reboot of #PurposedSpeech has been a following of an inner Voice-of-voices type thing. It is very comparable to how I now play piano: I get to listen to what is coming ... if taht makes any sense.

Regardless, Thx for reading and watching. The honorable duty of reclaiming for humans the Constitutionally protected right of #PurposedSpeech is, and should be, a non-violent *'shot heard round the world'. "The British are ..." is again a clarion call to the Militia of the Minds to stand in the gap that AI-powered corporate speech is widening; to reclaim #SovereigntyLOST; to engage in the hallmark of freedom: #EternalVigilance, and as a solemn bond ... and as a purposed price proudly – and with humility – paid.

Description Revisions – dates and substance summary list:

1/13/24: correction to titles spelling; inserting "[pending ...]", and given the minor revision is an understatement; adding the poem link; correcting LD 9 to be LD1775; fixed "intended", "Puritan", "that" misspellings; changed "who" to "how" regarding listening.

Procrastinator note: Updating and creating linked comment was a low priority because of what a filing for summary judgement constitutes. The matter is in the hands of a judge. This updating is also now a low priority due to the DEP updating the Department's Administrative Rule Chapter utilizing a public comment period that is exceptionally limited to 10 days following the public hearing on January 18th.

As I dig into what is changed, much of that is written to make the filing I affect on appeal, a one-and-only thing relative to purposed human speech. Such is an amazing affirmation-in-the-negative concerning the substance of the filing ... and incredibly sad relative to the overreach of executive power which this bastardization of the rulemaking process represents. Rulemaking is a delegated legislative branch power ... and this to agencies alone. What is done with that power as rules is to be reported back by agencies to the legislature, and this regardless of whether the rulemaking is routine technical, or major substantive (Title 5, Articles 2 & 2-A). Currently this is not practiced. Purposed human speech is harmed by this. (Further explaination: the different classes of non-emergency rulemaking relate solely to whether a public hearing is mandated by the legislature or an option an agency and/or the public can exercise in an otherwise common rulemaking process as prescribed under the MAPA statues.)

3/15/24: ported the original upload's framing for #PurposedSpeech. Edited the above introductory explanation for clarity. (These revisions are integral to sharing what was yesterday's filing of a §300-8 petition with Winslow for an emergency moratorium ordinance and hydrogen, which Title 35-A., Chapter 34-E irresponsibly unleashed upon Maine for the purpose of Avarice.)